Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children these days behave more impolitely than children fifty years ago.
Some people claim that children nowadays are acting more terribly than children fifty years ago, while others think the opposite. As for me, I believe that children these days are behaving badly due to three reasons mentioned below.
To begin with, children nowadays are taught the importance of critical thinking, so they will act more rudely than children in the past. To be more specific, my niece once shouted at my aunt for forcing him to wear female uniforms to school because she considered herself to be a man. Similarly, my nephew also refused to wear uniforms because he supposed that wearing them violates freedom of expression. As a result, my uncle and aunt always complain to me that their kids are recalcitrant. On the other hand, children in the past are educated to obey authorities, so my father could not criticize his school for forcing everyone to wear uniforms. Evidently, children these days think more critically than kids in the past.
In addition, children today care more about reputation, which means that they would act impolitely to defend their reputation. Take my professor's son as an example. My professor's son once got a C on his math final exam, and my professor scolded him for not studying hard. Nonetheless, his son broke down and yelled back at his parents for portraying him as an unintelligent person. Moreover, he even questioned whether his parents like him or not. Contrarily, my grandfather always condemned my father for getting A- on his English test, but he ignored his father's criticism all the time because he did not think it is a big deal. Indeed, kids nowadays care more about getting a favorable image than those who were born in the 1970s.
Last but not least, modern young people place more emphasis on friendship than parental relationships, so they will undoubtedly behave more impolite to their parents. For example, my friend's daughter tends to believe whatever her friends told her and choose to ignore her parents. To be more specific, my friend once told her not to eat pizza dropped onto the ground, but she dismissed my friend and yelled at him that food accidentally dropped on the ground for less than 5 seconds is still edible, all because her friends said so. Nonetheless, my aunt listened to every sentence that my grandmother said. Thus, whenever she dropped her food unintentionally, she did not pick it up and eat it. Obviously, kids in the past indeed listen to their parents more, but kids nowadays pay more attention to their friends.
In conclusion, I maintain that children these days indeed behave more horribly than children years ago. After all, kids these days care more about critical thinking, reputation, as well as their friendship.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching films as they learn by reading books 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Letting a friend make a mistake is better than saying or doing something that would destroy the friendship 90
- Imagine you are working on a group project with two coworkers and the deadline the time that the project should be submitted is approaching The project looks good but could be improved if you all work on it more however this would mean that you miss the d 73
- Imagine that you are considering taking action to improve your performance in order to get better grades marks school or to get a promotion and higher pay at work You are considering the following two actions Doing additional work or extra assignments bey 76
- Imagine you have one week to spend on a vacation in a city you ve never been to before Would you prefer to spend the week participating in scheduled activities such as going on guided tours of the city or would you prefer to spend the week exploring the c 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, similarly, so, still, thus, well, while, after all, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94989106754 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65179113822 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514161220044 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4085528147 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7826086957 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86956521739 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238058110922 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088690510393 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122914577233 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203359544906 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137096579571 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.