Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the distant past, with the intention of achieving the best outcomes, governments all around the world have been looking for the most appropriate fields to spend their budget. In this regard, although some people advocate budgeting arts, many individuals hold the view that it is an essential task for governments to financially support athletes and Olympic teams. I am personally inclined to believe that the former approach pales in comparison to the latter. I cling to this viewpoint for two main reasons and will shed light upon in the following.
To begin with, if governments spend money on athletics, a larger number of individuals within the target society will benefit from this decision due to the fact that more people are interested in sports and Olympic teams than arts. To be more specific, it is undeniable that sports and athletics are highly widespread means of entertainment among people around the globe. However, passion in arts and artistic movements is merely limited to a small fraction of individuals who entirely understand the far-reaching concepts of art. In fact, arts are in most cases truly complicated, thus leaving ones in sheer confusion. For example, take the complex paintings by Leonardo Davinci. Without any shadows of doubt, barely are ordinary individuals, who consist the major part of almost any society, able to appreciate the profound notions underlying these feats. On the other hand, regardless of their nationality, sports are easily understood and interpreted by most of the people, making special tournaments such as Olympics extremely popular events. Accordingly, supporting athletics takes precedence over supporting arts because it will cover the interests of a larger group of people in a society.
Aside from this, supporting athletics and Olympic teams will indeed result in a healthier society. To put this in a more vivid picture, if governments spend money on the improvement of these scopes, it will lead to national and global success in sports events. As a result, people will be encouraged to bring more exercise and physical activity into their lives. This stems from their interest in pursuing the success of their favorite teams and their widespread attachment to sports. The result of this would be more active and healthier societies. An example of my own country drives this concept home. During the past few years, the government of my country has outstandingly supported our national Volleyball team. Consequently, they have achieved brilliant results in recent tournaments. Surprisingly, since their very first global success, the people's interest in this particular sport has increased significantly. Prior to that time, rarely was it possible for us to see individuals playing Volleyball professionally in parks and open space. However, today, it has become a quite widespread activity among youth. Wherever I go, from streets to green spaces, I have a good chance of seeing a large number of people playing Volleyball. This is indeed the direct impact of those global achievements. If the same strategy is applied to other sports fields, more people will be encouraged to spend their time playing sports and our societies will become healthier.
In conclusion, bearing the foregoing points and examples in mind, I firmly believe that governments should spend their money on athletics and Olympic teams rather than arts. This is not only because such a decision will positively address the interests of a larger number of people in any society, but it will encourage individuals to engage in physical activities and playing sports which in turn will contribute to the emergence of a healthier society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support thi 80
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects of the way young people behave. Agree or disagree? 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support thi 80
- the passage and the lecture are discussing a device called TED for saving endangered sea turtles 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 942, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was rarely
...ased significantly. Prior to that time, rarely was it possible for us to see individuals p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1197, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... spaces, I have a good chance of seeing a large number of people playing Volleyball. This is inde...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in most cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3097.0 1977.66487455 157% => OK
No of words: 587.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27597955707 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84272524297 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 212.727598566 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517887563884 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 942.3 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.362445771 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.607142857 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9642857143 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181133845546 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490472866912 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591893710311 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125577109017 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294539034777 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 86.8835125448 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.