Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support this idea. the lecturer believed that the reasons are given in passage arent convincing and stated reasons to counter the passage.
The article states that hail has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the united states. Over the last decades, a method called cloud seeding has been tried for hail reduction. The essay provides three reasons that cloud seeding has been effective. However, the lecturer explains that the idea of cloud seeding being impactful is not totally clear and there are lots of questions remaining unanswered and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that laboratory experiments may reveal the effect of cloud seeding by expressing that when silver iodide is added to cold water, often snow forming would be observable instead of hail pellets. The lecturer refutes this point by saying that it might be true that adding silver iodide to evaporating water in the laboratory may create snow, but in the normal situation, it might prevent snow and rain from forming as well as hail, which can cause lack of water and eventually drought in arid areas.
Second, the article posits that there is evidence from several countries such as Asian countries that cloud seeding has been proven impactful offering that this method is potentially advantageous in the United States. The lecturer states that it might be effective in Asian urban cities with highly polluted air, caused by car traffic, etc... but there are no obvious reasons that it might have impressive impacts in less polluted air conditions.
Third, the reading announces that a few local studies support the value of cloud seeding by an example of a study conducted in a farming region in the United States which there was a reduction in hail damage as a result. The lecturer counters this idea by stating that the same study showed hail decline in surrounding the specific farming place, such as the south, east, and north of it. this might self-explain that the reduction of hail in specific farming place can be a result of a variation in weather in the whole region not just the effect of cloud seeding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-05 | mehrnaz.asadi | 80 | view |
| 2018-11-05 | mehrnaz.asadi | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support thi 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support thi 80
- the passage and the lecture are discussing a device called TED for saving endangered sea turtles 76
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects of the way young people behave. Agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92899408284 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40940322626 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511834319527 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3638958069 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.833333333 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210384204264 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802041324399 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443272910163 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11850576602 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390161022774 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.