Quality of education, which invariably associated with strength of a country, is always the biggest concern of parents and social communities. Nowadays, some people claim that increasing salaries level of university professors is a means of solution to improve the quality of education. It seems plausible at first glimpse. As far as I am concerned, this kind of solution is useless.
Indeed, university professors take a crucial role in fostering excellent students, and they are supposed to get deserve rewards. However, by spending more money on their salaries is the simple, rough and ineffective means to address the actual problem. The reasons are obvious.
First of all, great chances are that university professors begin to pay less attention on students' education, once they are given additional money effortlessly. Money, with on doubt serves a double-edged sword, which creates positive effects, on the other hand however, has negative impacts as well. Giving more money to university professors conveys the information to them that even though you don't dedicate too much attention to improve students' academic performance, you are also rewarded. As a result, the activities of these professors would decline.
In addition, professors are only one of the elements that can improve the quality of education. Apart from the campus' staff, it's environment of studying, the quality of management and corresponding teaching tools work together that makes a difference. Therefore, mainly focusing on professors is irrational and inadvisable. Schools, who engage to improve their educational quality should place emphasis on every aspect of possibilities rather than the single one.
Based on the arguments mentioned above, there are many drawbacks of the standpoint which thinks that spending more money on professors' salaries would work. I firmly draw the conclusion that universities could improve their quality of education by increasing professors' salaries.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ofessors begin to pay less attention on students education, once they are given addition...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nformation to them that even though you dont dedicate too much attention to improve ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6220735786 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97008797499 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6565156203 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8823529412 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259242118532 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742004345533 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551367584163 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142111494017 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243326853078 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.