Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are having a hard time reaching a consensus on whether the university should give more salaries to university professors. Some folks believe that authority should spend money in other sectors. I agree with the reading state. Many reasons support my points of view, and I would explore a few of the most important ones here.
The primary reason to consider is that it supports them financially, and hence, they do not look for another job. To be more specific, they only focus their particular task. Obviously, some universities provide a low salary that is not sufficient for them as a result. As a result, they cannot concentrate attentively on their research works and impede academic programs. It is commonly admissible that a university's reputation depends on the academic performance associated with publication. Consequently, no one benefits from it. My own experiences are a compelling example of that. My university teacher Tasha where I studied my undergraduate program, used to go to other universities to teach students. Unfortunately, the university providing the money is deficient, and therefore, they did not pay total concentration on their students. Thus, many students received low grades. This example demonstrated that the economic condition forced him to do it.
The second point that comes to my mind is that giving decent money might help hire an excellent teacher. There is ample evidence suggesting that most of the time, good teacher leave their job due to getting little money. Evidently, other jobs offer better opportunities that are absent in the teaching profession. For instance, my teacher eyelet, who was a good sir but he resigned from the position. Since he got better works anywhere. Put it in other words, the students missed a talented teacher. This makes sense is that allocating enough money hold on a good teacher. If the teacher had gotten a thriving wage, he would not have gone anywhere.
Given the factors above, we may conclude that it plays a vital role in enhancing education progression by increasing salary.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 41 integrated writing 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 403, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rograms. It is commonly admissible that a universitys reputation depends on the a...
^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... sir but he resigned from the position. Since he got better works anywhere. Put it in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15773809524 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91773395196 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2816228888 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.2083333333 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207625375419 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504260180062 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051689206554 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119394092704 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953280190773 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.