Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of increasing of automation. Personally I disagree that people would lose their jobs if automation is increased in various fields. I feel this for two reasons which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with increasing in automation tools allows us to make processes more efficient and easier. While it is true that this would replace the jobs of manual or daily labourers would do these menial jobs it would also create many more opportunities in way we have never seen before. I have to admit that my opinion has been profoundly influenced by my ow personal experience. When I was little my parents did not have a mobile phone for a long time. This meant that they had to make calls through trunk calls or pay phone which were manually connected and dialled by people. When mobile phones were introduced these people lost their jobs. However, we must not fail to consider that with the introduction of mobile phones many people were hired for constructing mobile towers, many new telecom companies were established and manufacturing of mobile parts also lead to increasing labour forces. For this reason, if mobile phones were not introduced we might have saved a few jobs but would have not been able to establish a new sector and make more jobs.
Secondly, introducing technology in various sectors has often lead to great advancements and discoveries. These discoveries has paved new ways for people to work in and not scathed their employment. In short, automating mundane and banal tasks does not pose a job security threat but in fact encourages society to learn new things to make life better. For example, most people are often insecure about the fact that artificial intelligence in drones and robots as they would pose a threat to humanity and would make most people unemployed. These people are oblivious to the advantages of learning these technologies and are fixed on the fact that they would replace human jobs. These advancements were only possible because the we started using machines to do simple tasks and focused our bright minds to address the more important issues and to enhance the comforts of our lives. This indeed increased the opportunities in research and also in maintaining these products as per our choices. It's certainly clear to see why increasing automation would not be a bane to advancement or employment.
In the light of the reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe that introducing technology does not reduce job opportunities but in fact creates many more. This is because of it makes processes easier and less frustating and also supports technological advancements without affecting the employment of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | sanket_chaudhary | 88 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 63 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | cluelessme | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Mmddzz3 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs 73
- integrated writing TPO 7 70
- We have observed a gradual increase of the sea level during the last decades It is a slow increase and despite the alarmist attitudes of some it is nothing to be worried about By analyzing the data and looking into the matter clearly we can find that this 73
- Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school Which of these two school policies do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 80
- AIDS is a disease that has killed millions of people all over the world Most of the cases of AIDS in the world are in poorer countries where the people can t afford to buy the drugs that would help keep them alive and healthy Many AIDS Advocacy Groups AAG 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nually connected and dialled by people. When mobile phones were introduced these peo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...technology in various sectors has often lead to great advancements and discoveries. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ents and discoveries. These discoveries has paved new ways for people to work in an...
^^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...advancements were only possible because the we started using machines to do simple tas...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i feel, in fact, in short, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01754385965 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76649408733 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510964912281 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4035122172 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.952380952 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231066996157 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730949965848 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777871904103 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157451563331 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094623212031 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.