Do you agree/disagree with the following statement?
The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs.
It is true that the world is rapidly undergoing a technological shift with increasing advancement and breakthroughs, leading us towards a world driven by automation.
Automation is the process of having everything done by robots or automated devices which do not require human intervention while working. It is said that soon we would be having robots or robotic devices all over the world. The statement states that automation could replace humans and they might lose their jobs. I completely disagree that an increase in automation would reduce the jobs available for humans.
Firstly, the rising technological advancements over the years have been because of human intervention. The fact that in order to program a robot to do tasks like humans require programming which can only be done by a human. Robots are intended to facilitate automation for human activities, but this does not rule out that future human intervention would be reduced since there is going to be a constant human to robot interaction in every field. The type of jobs required could be changed in the coming years with the world rapidly moving towards an era of automation that requires people to expertise in the computer-based domains.
Secondly, we have seen in the last decade with computers introduction there was fear that a certain percentage of the population would not be able to get a job. Whereas, over the years computers have taken a hold of almost every field without replacing humans. On the other hand, with computers intervention, people find it a lot easier to work as it has significantly reduced our efforts. The fact that operating a computer requires a set of skills and the same applies to future automation practices. Therefore, automation would certainly make things easier for us, at the same time it would demand particular skillsets to aid further research and development ultimately changing the type of jobs required and not removing it.
In conclusion, the increase in automation would change jobs in the future rather than remove them. People will have to acquire knowledge and skills to facilitate automation as we saw what happened with computer’s introduction at the start of last decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | sanket_chaudhary | 88 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 63 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | cluelessme | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Mmddzz3 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree disagree with the following statement The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs 88
- Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring that their products are safe If a product injures someone for whatever reason the manufacturer should be held legally and financially accountable for the injury Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree w 50
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Passage We have observed a gradual increase of the sea level during the last decades It is a slow increase and despi 73
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the vice president of Gigantis a development company that builds and leases retail store facilities Nationwide over the past five years sales have increased significantly at outlet stores that deal exclusively i 60
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ulation would not be able to get a job. Whereas, over the years computers have taken a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14722222222 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93219543375 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.981130542 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8125 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221051132968 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783906918687 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608233207588 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134820112046 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559619307773 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.