Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping into conclusions. After all, every question or topic required a careful deliberation in that there are always many valuables to a truth. Even though some may adamantly believe that choosing one specializes in one specific subject is better than many subjects, I strongly think such opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, I believe that that choosing many academic subjects is so much better that one subject for the following reasons.

First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with this notion that it is better to have a board studying in a different subject because this will increase opportunities to find jobs in the future. The main reason behinds this rationale is that learning different topics would board people horizons enhances skills, and correct people values, which might increase the opportunities to get better jobs. In addition to that, it might help people to increase their intent for doing research and studying more and more. To illustrate thoroughly, if a person applies for a job, the first thing that any company is looking for is the resume (CV), this person would obtain many chances, instead of one chance, particularly, if he has many certifications in different academic subjects. Consequently, studying different academic topics would significantly affect people lives since this would increase their chances to get better job options.
Another excellent point to be mentioned here is that learning many academic subjects would increase people communications. In other word, learning different matter would enhance people relationship like, making new friends, meeting many people with the same interest, and also intensify people's ability to work in a team. For example, a student in biology, he learns from lectures, laboratories, and even experiments. He can work in different areas and different situations because he uses to do for a long time. Furthermore, the same student can work in a team, which is so important, because his studying needs many people to work together. So, studying many academic subjects has an essential impact on people because this would increase communication and enhance the ability to work in a team.
In summation, yes, it is virtually impossible to provide a completely satisfying answer to an open-ended question. Although the jury may be out on this essay topic, we can come to a mutual agreement that learning of many academic subjects is better than specialize in one specific subject due to the reasons and details mentioned above.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...extent. In my humble opinion, I believe that that choosing many academic subjects is so m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e subject for the following reasons. First and foremost, the majority of indi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir chances to get better job options. Another excellent point to be mentioned ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, after all, for example, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21445221445 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81998877792 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4092832514 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.588235294 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230879494553 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809847622396 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853538312313 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170408094764 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769028535997 0.0645574589148 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.