Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In our contemporary world, there are too many academic subjects which you can get broad knowledge in it. Colleges and universities are the places that introduce these various fields to us. However, should we acquaint with all of these fields or be specialized in one of them? I am of the opinion that we should find our interests and get more knowledge about them and be expert in them.
To begin with, every body have hidden potential in their attribute which help them to enhace and raise in distinct profession in their life. For instance, some people have talent in musics and others have potential in mathematic. these kind of people should enrich their knowledge in complete different fields. Because someone who plays musical instrument doesn't need to know anything about discrete math or differential equation. On the other hand, someone who studies engineering does not need to know about notes. Therefore, my point is that every one must follow their dreams and specialize in specific field.
Nowadays, study fields are exceedingly eclectic which expand in wide area of diverse subjects. For example, computer engineering is one of the well-known fields which is taught in many universities. but the main point is that become expert in this field entirely is something inaccessible. due to it is divided in too many different branches that you should get knowledge in throughly different subject. For instance, it is divided in to computer graphic , artificial intelligence, hardware, etc. To be profotional in all of them you should spend a lot of time. In my opinion, in any field you should be familiar in most of its branches and discover your interest and expertise in it.
In a nutshell, it is impossible for human beings to specilize in broad academic fields due to shortage of time. Hence, the solution is that each person should go after their interests. Moreover each field in our mundane modern world can be deviated in many different other fields and everyone must become familiar in most of them and choose their beloved one to specialize in it.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for people to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...nd others have potential in mathematic. these kind of people should enrich their know...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...nd others have potential in mathematic. these kind of people should enrich their knowledge...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...se someone who plays musical instrument doesnt need to know anything about discrete ma...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...s which is taught in many universities. but the main point is that become expert in...
^^^
Line 13, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...eld entirely is something inaccessible. due to it is divided in too many different ...
^^^
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...accessible. due to it is divided in too many different branches that you should get knowledge ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 455, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce, it is divided in to computer graphic , artificial intelligence, hardware, etc....
^^
Line 19, column 186, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...person should go after their interests. Moreover each field in our mundane modern world ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 253, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...mundane modern world can be deviated in many different other fields and everyone must become ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iated in many different other fields and everyone must become familiar in most of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0288184438 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69770506736 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518731988473 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6808146556 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.25 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159635318518 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494219999065 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570009268312 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991773468154 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272735849036 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.