Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Nowadays, people think that working for a longer time in fewer days per week may be better than working for shorter periods of time on more days. But, I myself totally disagree with this for three specific reasons which I will discuss in the following paragraphs.
First of all, working for longer hours, results in less creativity. Actually, when you work for more than 8 hours per day, at the very last hours, you are doing almost nothing. Because your brain is literally tired and out of energy. Hence, in the last hours of working for a long time during a day, you will Turin into a less productive person who is just filling time.
Secondly, in my point of view, putting all the pressure of working on three specific days, restricts people. But how? Well, let me explain this with an example. Imagine that your job needs a great deal of creativity and needs you to always brainstorm new ideas. Working on three specific days, you don't have the chance to try new ideas, change your mind, and examine whatever you have thought of multiple times and revise your ideas if necessary. Therefore, it is natural to lose your passion and creativity after a long period of time. That's because, during the three workdays, you have to work constantly, and hence, you will feel more pressure and stress to think openly about the problems.
Finally, yet importantly, most of the people think that having more free days, they can live better and do more activities. But I totally disagree with the idea. Honestly speaking, side activities can be beneficial in case they are done on a daily basis. For instance, if you work about 10 hours a day, you will not have enough energy to do some sports and care about your physical health. However, if you work about 6 hours per day, you have the chance to cook and eat healthier, do sports, care about your mental health, etc.
In a nutshell, I think that working only three days a week for long hours is not better than having a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours for three main reasons. This way you will lose your interest and enthusiast, your productivity, and even the chance to do side activities. Hence, I suggest everyone to work more days a week, but under less pressure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Integrated- TPO 46 80
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 30 integrated writing 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 14 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...as. Working on three specific days, you dont have the chance to try new ideas, chang...
^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...our passion and creativity after a long period of time. Thats because, during the three workda...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...creativity after a long period of time. Thats because, during the three workdays, you...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rts, care about your mental health, etc. In a nutshell, I think that working only...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, hence, honestly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5925 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31511203833 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4925 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9595434165 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.85 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.566951123597 0.236089414692 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157445028054 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156888515741 0.0737576698707 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349258762496 0.150856017488 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129456081972 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.