TPO 40- integrated
Both the author and the lecturer discuss the possibility of living on Venus. The author believes that because of the condtions on Venus, it is impossible to live there. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that by preparing a station, fifteen kilometers above Venus' surface we can live there.
First of all, the author points out that the pressure at Venus' surface is much higher that earth's. It is mentioned that by the high pressure anything will be crushed. This point is challenged bu the lecturer. He says that by using that station, the pressure would not be an important thing because it is fifteen kilometers far from Venus' surface. Furthermore, he argues that since the station is not on the surface, there is not a danger of crushing.
Secondly, the author contends that there is not any supply of water or oxygen on Venus. The article notes that only gasses like carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid are available there. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests making water by using gasses on Venus, because it is possible. Hence, there is no need to transport water from earth.
Finally, the author states that clouds near Venus block the way for sunlight and this makes it a very cold place to live. The article establishes that these clouds actually reflect the sunlight and there is not enough light on Venus. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the clouds are not that thick to block the sunlight completely. Moreover, he puts forth the idea that the station can save both the sunlight and the light that is reflected by the clouds, so there will be enough electricity to be used.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents jobs 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A good leader should spend more time listening to other people s ideas than taking his or her own ideas 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- TPO 27-Independent 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75261324042 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36628210393 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494773519164 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9637380267 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7777777778 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356100297151 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104340511955 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620024554811 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203998829458 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523534240779 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.