Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Since the dawn of civilization, vast majorities of human beings have been looking for a well-paid and a decent job in order to thrive in their personal life. In fact, they have been putting their efforts so as to find a successful career to guarantee their future life. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether working only three days per week is more enjoyable and effective or working five days a week. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that working throughout the week is more beneficial for individuals. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, having a conspicuous career is an essence of life and hardly can people reach the pinnacle of their life without an appropriate job. In fact, people need suitable jobs to flourish in their personal life. Generally phrased, working hours during a day play a key role in the efficiency of employees and they need to be fresh to work properly and accurately. Although working for a long time in three days of a week will provide an opportunity for workers to have a much more time during the rest of the week, they would not be able to work meticulously and vigorously so as a result, they will become exhausted without any energy and motivation to keep their job. Based on a research conducted in my country, people who have been worked for five days in a week had better performance during their career. Although they had less time to spend on other activities, at least they had been able to do their tasks positively and successfully. To elucidate more on this issue, there is no doubt that if people work for a long time in a day, they will run out of energy and myriads of mistakes will accompany their tasks.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that working a long time during a day will certainly prevent employees from leading a healthy life. If we take a minute to ponder over it, crowds of people are not physically potent enough to seat on a chair and work. Not only can their physical health decrease over time but also their mental capacity can diminish with the pass of time. Eyesight effects, boring, stress, and many other diseases are of utmost important problems that people should take them into consideration when working for a long time.
However, working during three days of a week will provide fertile ground for workers to spend much more time with their families and friends. As a matter of fact, they will be able to gather for a family reunion and get informed of many things that happened to them. Also, a great chance will be provided for those who need help to address their problems.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- TPO24 85
- Some people think that automobile has improved modern life. Other think that automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? 86
- "Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock-and-roll music station. Consider, for example, that the number of people in our listening area over fifty years of age has increased dramatically, while our total number of listener 29
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- What is one thing you will do to improve your community? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...t, they have been putting their efforts so as to find a successful career to guarantee t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, well, as to, at least, in fact, no doubt, as a matter of fact, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68336673347 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55203319772 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482965931864 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4074471607 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7619047619 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292664584076 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948335514358 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831026864774 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15421240655 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980809870163 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.