In the modern era, professions are universally regarded as a crucial factor contributing constructively to all facets of our lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the amount of time we spend at work. Many people adhere to the view that it is worthy to spend more time at work so that we reduce the number of workdays per week, while others find less operational hours more convenient. I firmly believe working for inordinate hours is harmful and does not contain any valuable contribution to our lives. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that this approach will reduce the time that people spend with their families. However, it seems that four days off the working environment can increase the blending time with family members, it reduces it. Most of our family members are busy with school or their occupations during the days, so even if we do not go to work, we can not spend time with them. To put it in a more vivid picture, when I was preparing for the university entrance test, my mother wanted to have more time with me to aid me in my studies. She extended her workdays from four to six so that she worked fewer hours per day. As a result, whenever I got home from school, my mother's presence fabulously intensified my study quality.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that after several hours of working in a row, its caliber will be reduced because of tiredness and lack of concentration. As a result, the error rate will be radically increased, and people might become on the verge of getting fired which can make them insecure about their professions. On the other hand, people who work fewer hours merely tend to maintain a tremendous focus which yields better results without any fluctuations. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About a year ago, I signed up for a position at a company while I was studying at the university. I planned my class schedule so that I go to work three days for eleven hours and attend my classes on the other days. I noticed that after seven hours of working, I could not handle my tasks as fast as the previous hours, and I made plenty of terrible mistakes. So, I was always worried I might get fired which was humiliating for me. I did not get fired, but I learned an excessive amount of time at work would harm the quality of my tasks, thus I scheduled my next semester to diffuse my working hours within several days.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that working regularly within normal hours is more beneficial to our lives' balance rather than working three days with excessive pressure. Because, it provides us with more blending time with our family, plus it does not exert negative effects on the quality of our duties.
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in brief, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2393.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.673828125 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62441210748 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52734375 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9262122483 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.772727273 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187990567123 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574597058922 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423560138816 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125776513532 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106018626035 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.