Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends. Use specific reason and examples to support your answer.
It is important for every people to sustain the old relationship and struggle to enhance this vital element of human life. I agree with this fact because old friends are holy and they can help us to some social and financial situation. It obvious this kind of community has a value from two aspects like the social and financial aspects. This essay attends to examine this perspective.
In the first step, from the social aspect, it seems that a group of old friends can improve the mental health of society. By a way explanation, elderly people often are alone and they tend to talk with other people. the review of their history of elderly people have narrated by a group of people who were in the past and they involved in the same situation. However, young people suffer from speaking to them. Due to spending time with older people, the subject of their speaking is ignored by them. In general, a group of old friends can be defined as a strong community of people who understand the commonplace of experience between peers. So, it is vital to demand every people to keep their old friend to talk and share the old experience. Besides, there is a way to escape loneliness.
Additionally, usually, every person in a society has a financial situation. The old friend has been a place to give some financial resources to help or fill this kind of problem. In particular, in the middle east, some research has shown that, a half nation which is suffering from heavy sanction resort to introduce a central bank in order to support other countries in front of sanction’s problem. In addition, all less developed countries are followed by the UN to act as well as middle east countries. Nonetheless, the international power makes a big decision for avoiding this role by adopting challengeable law.it is obvious, if the nation keeps their old friend in the political situation, they will resolve a vast range of difficulties regarding the economy. Consequently, a group of old friends can be beneficial for everyone.
In conclusion, it is holy to see the old friend regarding filling the majority of gaps in the context of social because they are the only way for reshaping and helping the social and people characteristics. On the other hand, we can count them for our problems in daily life. For instance, in the international setback which has a negative impact on the big decision.
- Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past Which one of the following measure do you think can help children age 5 10 behave better A Control the time they spend on TV or movie B Take more time to chat with children C Monitor the 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration 87
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 67
- The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vocation programs Which one do you think is better for students 1 Take some college courses in advance e g some courses that are related to students major 2 Visit some 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Company should pay for employees to get university degree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nd they tend to talk with other people. the review of their history of elderly peop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80387409201 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76573101334 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496368038741 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2721569859 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4761904762 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7619047619 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148517320935 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455266100158 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474568356545 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897259373867 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299257551326 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.