Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Living today is more comfortable and easier than when your grandparents were children.
Every individual certainly wants a life in which they are happy and can live longer without being dependent on another person. Life in the past was way different than it is today. I strongly believe that life back then was not easy and comfortable as it is today. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent essay.
To begin with, old generations faced a plethora of problems when it comes to connecting with loved ones. To connect with families and friends, they had to write letters in order to stay in touch with them. However, in today's generation, advanced technology has made many lives easier than before. Smartphones, computers, and many other apps have a huge impact on the younger generation. For example, my grandparents had to write letters to my dad to ask how he is doing and it used to take virtually 10 days to get to my dad. In contrast, I live in the USA and by just emailing him and calling him through my smartphone, I can easily reach out to him without wasting my precious time and procrastinate response. Thanks to these innovations that keep our relations in a healthy position.
In addition to this, people back then had to walk several miles to reach from one destination to another. Now, automobiles have been used by individuals to travel to far distances. To be more specific, my grandfather had to walk his office every morning which took him to 40 minutes walk. Due to this, he got joint pain and could not walk as a result, he had to leave his work. On the other hand, my dad works with a huge insurance company. His company sends him to other states at least twice a month for different deals. He flies to other states via airplane without even thinking to walk so many miles. All in all, these automobiles can save our precious time and let us not to walk. Consequently, there will not be an issue of muscle and joint pain.
To sum up, today's life is different and comfortable than in the past. This is because technology has made everyone’s lives easier and automobiles have saved a big time and great for people's health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-06 | Safa Arshad | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-19 | Attia Yaqoob | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | arun-kum6 | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | Md. Mahafuzur Rahaman | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | 29roysoma | 90 | view |
- High taxes on cigarettes TPO 53 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage Nutria is a beaver like rat sized approximately 24 inches long growing up to 20 pounds and usually living in semi aquatic habitats T 83
- TPO 53 High taxes on cigarettes 60
- TPO 33 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 70
- For making long lasting friendship which ONE do you prefer 1 Friends who help you when you need or in dire situations 2 Friends who share the same thinking and characteristics 3 Friends who trust each other 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...son. Life in the past was way different than it is today. I strongly believe that li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, then, at least, for example, i feel, in addition, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57029177719 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60569276171 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554376657825 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.185782795 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3181818182 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1363636364 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138812875183 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041118888266 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502425504597 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094980228292 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490231060834 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.