Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
One quality that a successful leader must have is the ability to make decisions quickly. When leaders take too much time to make decisions, they will be seen as ineffective by the people they lead.
The question is whether a leader should make decision as soon as possible or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to refute the mentioned idea. One should realize that sometime it is vital for leaders to make decisions quickly particularly in business field because needless to say that in the business world, fast deciding can help businessmen to overcome their rivals but in the majority of conditions, a leader has to consider all aspects of group and its members; hence, taking time for decisions can be a logical solution. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my point of view:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that a guide plays a crucial role in group living. Such a powerful man is able to arrange all activities, divide tasks related to group, motivate the members for achieving goals and provide needed stuff and list goes on; therefore, without him and his assists, group will not be able to pursue its purposes any more. One should not forget that since the leaders' decisions affect members' life directly, so it is essential for a leader pays attention to group's requirements and decides accurately otherwise the negative impacts of faster deciding will be irrecoverable. To elucidate, take my own experience. Last year, I was a leader in an excavation group. When we obtained an ancient pottery, I took a risk and commended the pottery to be washed up without consulting with restoration team, briefly the fragile pottery destroyed and all members disappointed. In short, taking time for thinking and consulting with others will be efficient.
The second reason for my argument lies the reality that every group has a dedicated budget, consequently, it goes without saying that making decisions quickly may waste time and money group. Based on a done research in a well-known institution, whenever a person takes risk and decide fast, the percentage of his failure will be high; subsequently for compensation of this fail, he has to spend much time and money to recover the circumstance. Yet with enough searching, attempting for acquiring new and useful data and even more doing some small experiments, one will be able to guarantee the prosperity of his group.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that I strongly disagree with deciding fast and without thinking because it can postpone achieving goals; however, a logical decision which is made during a long time, would lead the members and group toward the success.
- Do you agree or disagree? The food we eat today is much healthier than past. 90
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students hold 93
- do you agree or disagree with this sentence?to remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success. 30
- Do you agree or disagree? to improve the quality of education, the universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, as to, i feel, in short, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0091954023 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72821364441 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570114942529 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.2234913731 48.9658058833 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.642857143 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0714285714 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 5.45110844103 200% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227420810663 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853707159273 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441746637868 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142202555923 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268318501911 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.