Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Nowadays people do not stop debating about how they can find a well-paid job which will lead to a success in the long term. Although it seems plausible at first that nowadays it is simpler for people to find a specific kind of profession to have a prosperous future since there are a wide variety of appliances which can help them, I would counter this point of view because of some reasons. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following essay.
Above all, due to the rapid development of technology, we have more and more new things with which we can perform our tasks. To be more exact, there are some new methods or new machineries in each field which can play people's role. Take cars as a kind of product, for example. A person who worked in a car factory two or three decades ago could be sure that he/she will have a successful future while nowadays they should be concerned about their works all the time since it is more likely that human invent some new robot to do those tasks. As a result, finding an occupation which will result in successful following is more difficult nowadays than it was in the past.
The other reason which deserves some words here is that the world are changing every day due to the considerable improvement which are happening in distinctive fields of science. To clarify this point, every career, which seems a great one today can be a useless tomorrow. Some kinds of doctors are compelling example of that. There is no need for some of them these days as the effective medicines are made for some specific diseases. Hence, a job which was really reliable for future success, has fewer costumer than ever.
Another subtle point which I should deem lies on the fact that cultural changes are happening more markedly than the past since there are different sorts of social media in the world. Consequently, there will be new criteria for a successful life in the future and one cannot claim that his/her career will lead to a successful future. Therefore, get an occupation which will make a successful future is more challenging nowadays than ever.
To sum up, based on aforementioned arguments explored in this essay, I strongly believe that it is more demanding to find a profession which will result in a prosperous future than it was in the past.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i mean, kind of, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64778325123 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53198256667 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512315270936 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8383136765 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141819544345 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532834590669 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383541769794 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877613507474 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204073607222 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.