Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
practice the question
Whereas some believe that it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. I hold a different standpoint for the following reasons that will be further explored in the following essay.
To begin with, earlier in the twentieth century, there were no labor laws that defines the relationship between the employer or the government from one side, and the worker from the other side. In other words, employees didn’t have any health insurance or restrictions regarding minimum wage. This resulted in harsh work conditions for the employee. For example, he won’t get paid if he gets sick. Also, employees were forced to work six days per week at minimum wage. Therefore, there was no security for employees in the past. Nowadays, on the other hand, many laws and rules restrict these illegal processes that were implemented on the employees. Accordingly, a person who works for the government or a company is offered health insurance for him and his family. In addition, he can’t be paid less than the minimum wage of his profession. Not to mention, he gets a retirement payment at the age of sixty to secure his living expenses. All these advantages are the consequence of the contract secured by the laws that the government enforced to ensure a fair and ethical work environment for the employees.
What’s more, due to the rapid pace of technology and science advancement, we can see that professions’ specifications have become tremendously diverse. Consequently, diverse jobs require more employees to fill in these vacancies. Accordingly, one can easily find his preferred field of work and be educated more to qualify for any of these various specifications of the same field. For example, my brother-in-law graduated from civil engineering. However, he works now as an expense engineer. A very peculiar position that requires an employee who graduated from civil engineering but received some business administration education as well. Obviously, he majored in civil engineering and got his master’s in business administration after he graduated. His master’s degree assisted in his hunting for the job he loves as an engineer.
To sum up, work laws and diverse specifications within the same field had contributed to the better opportunity for people to find a job that leads to a secure, bright future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- It s important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends do you agree or disagree 60
- People in society work in many different settings and for a variety of reasons What do you think is the main reason why people have jobs to feel happier about their lives to save money for the future to develop new skills Use specific examples and details 60
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First the inc 71
- extended family are less important than in the past 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14507772021 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02216480249 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556994818653 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8206909128 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2727272727 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04545454545 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110068691076 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361981627423 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706452274048 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108115177881 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108468882985 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.