Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Whereas some people argue the efficiency of work done by someone who is busy doing many tasks. I believe it is possible that one can do many tasks with high efficiency for the following reasons.
To begin with, It is possible that one can get distracted when incorporating himself into many tasks at the same time over a short period. However, with a good time schedule, they can finish all the work before the deadline. This deadline should be estimated based on the tasks at hand. Good time management, associated with consistency will eventually get the person to his goal. For example, I had a hard exam related to my job. Not to mention, I work 10 hours daily and get back home to cook and clean the house. Thus, I didn’t have enough time to study, work, and take care of the house at the same time. Nevertheless, I wanted to give the exam so I can get this advanced certificate. So, I set a time schedule with an estimated logical deadline and I was so strict following my schedule. Fortunately, I was able to finish right before the deadline. I also gave my exam and got an excellent grade. If I hadn’t set this time schedule, I wouldn’t have been able to give the exam. That’s why Time scheduling is one of the most important tools to handle many tasks with high efficiency.
In addition, Exerting the right effort is the key to handling many tasks efficiently. If one cannot exert enough effort, they cannot finish even one task given to them. This is because they lack one of the most crucial tools needed for finishing a task. These tools are subjective initiative and human potential. Without these two tools, no work will be done. On the other hand, with these tools, one can perform several missions in a certain period with high efficiency.
To sum up, The hope for handling many tasks and doing them well without proper time management nor enough effort exerted could be distracting. Meanwhile, great work can be done with an efficient time schedule and tremendous effort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- it is important to keep old friends than have new friends do you agree or disagree 70
- keeping old friends is more important than making new friends do you agree or disagree 73
- extended family are less important than in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whereas some people argue the efficiency of wor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65536723164 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55352856953 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8131009972 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.652173913 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3913043478 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125893413023 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388065351215 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487968051052 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105619576349 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678443693327 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.