Everyday each person has to make an important decision in their lives. In fact, these would be very challenging, and sometimes they would need help from trusted people around them. Honestly, when we consider those challenges, I agree with the statement given that people shouldn’t make decisions alone, and I have two logical reasons for this.
First of all, people would have lots of doubts about the result of their decisions, and having support from a trusted face would make the decision easier for us. Logically thinking, increase in importance would cause an increase in the risks that a person will take by taking that decision. In these cases, no doubt, everybody seeks a friend or family member who they trust and share these doubts with them. Additionally, a recent study showed that increasing stress would cause loose decision making ability. In fact, discussing these doubts is in a way a brainstorm. Thus, they would find a better solution for this problem, which requires the decision to be made.
Another reason is the dependence of people to each other. This holds in each parcel of the society that we live together. For instance, if we think of a married couple, and one of them decides to move to another city. What would the other partner do in this situation? Although there aren’t any restrictions limiting these decisions on law, in my humble opinion, they have responsibilities to each other by heart. Hence, they should talk about the situation and decide together what would be best for both of them. Consequently, decision making alone shouldn’t be an option when we live together with loved ones.
Overall, decision making is a challenging act, especially one with high importance. I agree and believe that people should make decisions not alone. Not only would others help them with their doubts, but also we shouldn’t forget that we live together with others.
- Altruism is a type of behaviour in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism 88
- TOEFL T P O 1 Integrated Writing Task 8
- T P O-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is speci 76
- TPO 1 3
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Us 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
Everyday each person has to make an important de...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, honestly, if, so, thus, as to, for instance, in fact, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01892744479 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58110486413 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4704566468 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7368421053 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19429068867 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701074883934 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068503328667 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140718764 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426937621188 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.