Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Rules and policies have a great influence on our lives. They impact our progress and prosperity as they affect our lives directly. Therefore, I disagree with the statement that society has too strict rules for young people to follow. This is due to the fact that these rules have brought some equalities, more freedom life, and they may benefit from following policies in their professional life.
To begin with, having strict policies make young adults learn how to follow rules. In fact, most of the people need to acquire this skill in order to have a decent professional life in the future. This is due to the fact that most of the workplaces have certain policies for their employees to follow in order to keep track of their work. For example, every hospital has some kind of rules regarding patient's insurance, medical supplies, and patient appointments. The place would be a chaos without these rules, and service would not be done to any patient. Moreover, the following rules can build their sense of responsibility toward their society because it increases their safety and their quality of life in general. Thus, the rules from society are not too strict to be followed by youngsters.
Another reason why I think this is the ultimate choice is that rules help us to have more equality and freedom. Indeed, a few decades ago, black people had fewer rights and slavery was in its higher rates. With the strict laws now, all human beings have a kind of similarities based on their quality. It does not matter whether it is their ethnicity or gender. For instance, when people go to job interview now, they do not have to worry about this issue because the more qualified person will get the job regardless of ethnicity and gender. Furthermore, people have more freedom now to say their opinion because of the strict rules. Hence, strict rules help in developing a better society, that's why young people should follow them.
For the aforementioned reasons, I genuinely disagree that the rules that society today expect youngsters to follow are too strict. Hopefully, people pay more attention to the benefits of these strict policies in making our society a better place for the next generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- TPO 20 integrated writing 90
- TPO 49 integrated essay 80
- TPO 28 integrated essay 76
- TPO 52 integrated essay 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... higher rates. With the strict laws now, all human beings have a kind of similari...
^^
Line 5, column 693, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...es help in developing a better society, thats why young people should follow them. ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s why young people should follow them. For the aforementioned reasons, I genuin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, in general, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.904 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49792233666 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514666666667 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8412100847 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.95 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267052088201 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101266117805 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121204821524 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191907910924 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443530181896 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.