Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
Past decades have witnessed an unprecedented boom in the media industry. Nowadays, with the prosperity of the media industry, people are attaching greater importance to keeping up-to-date with the latest news in different ways. Some people claim that media are less precise today owing to a desire to gain high profits, thus causing more social problems to the public. However, my view is apart from them that I believe the current coverage is more accurate than before.
In the first place, the supervision from the government ensures the accuracy of the free content. Once there is some misleading information published whether, in the newspaper or online, the established laws would punish the relating publishers. To illustrate, in Ｃhina, everyday views have depicted a tremendous number of persuasive scenes. I still remember the fake news, which was widespread between Chinese on WeChat, the most popular social media in China. It said that there would be a disastrous earthquake in Southwest of China on December 10th. But this prediction turned to be ridiculous because nothing happened on that day. As a result, the government imposed a severe punishment on that misleading author. In contrast to the past, the Chinese government has not published such strict regulations in the media realm.
Furthermore, equipped with a vast range of knowledge, people can distinguish right and wrong. To be more specific, in China, since the early 20th century, the government has been implementing nine-year compulsory education that requires local government to set budgets for covering the expenses of elementary schools and junior high school. Under this circumstance, people have opportunities to learn critical thinking, which indicates they would not do astray in front of incorrect information. Besides, due to the prevalence of the Internet, people have access to searching experts' explanations when they are susceptible or unsure about the news. Whereas, people in the past only believed things they heard and saw because authority explanations were unavailable for them, which made biased news spreading quickly.
To sum up, I would reiterate my standpoint that media reports are more accurate than before. One reason is the government's strict regulations and laws. Another reason is people's ability to critically thinking is improved.
- At one high school more of the students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many of students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignment The school is considering making a change t 85
- Do you agree or disagree after high school graduates should take at least one year off to work or travel before entering university 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least one year to work or travel It s better than attending university straight away 90
- The main role of a university professor is to educate students rather than do research 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes people think nowadays the media TV newspaper Internet are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: H
h Past decades have witnessed an unpreced...
^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heating author. In contrast to the past, the Chinese government has not published...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, still, thus, apart from, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82968803296 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617816091954 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5736357716 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5454545455 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193906248032 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484189446999 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439143740698 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116256340218 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565515248935 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.