Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public
The issue of whether nowadays media forecast their news less accurately compare to the past and this approach might cause more problems to the public aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if, were asked would agree with the statements that in today’s world media does not care about the accuracy of news while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I postulate nowadays, media like TV, newspapers, and Internet broadcast more precise news in comparison to the past. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is in the modern world, thanks to the advancement in technology, people have the access to the great variety of news resources which get them a chance to evaluate news they have heard in various resources, as important news reports by total news channels. For instance, if a specific news channel wants to deceive audiences by fake news they become aware when watching and reading other resources. Therefore, there is less likely the producers generate incorrect information.
In approaching this issue, apart from the reason given above, another reason that deserves some words is that the main target of these media is attracting more audiences and raise their company profit. Thus, they attempt to hire professional people to assess everything that is going to broadcast and this way decline the risk of mistake. These specialists revise and review the materials, again and again, otherwise, they would be the loser of this competition. For instance, my father is the reporter of one of the local news channel, he states since, the first policy for their channel is the accuracy of the news, if someone makes a mistake in this field he might fire or get the heavy penalty. As you see, they gain more revenue, consequently, this item is significant for them.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion nowadays media care to the accuracy of what they broadcast as people can evaluate their news by watching various channels. Moreover, producers are inclined to appeal more viewer, thus, they hire specialists to accomplish this task more precisely.
- TPO6 integrated essay 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 39 Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 50all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to accomplish this task more precisely.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for instance, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04188481675 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68593021156 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547120418848 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1041881532 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2379732162 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784102497466 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593931186677 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148003350702 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09510557798 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.