Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
The question is whether that a successful relationship with people is more crucial than school’s achievements for being prosperous in the future job. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to affirm that having such a great tie with others can provide a huge number of merits for the young. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that communication with different people, who have diverse backgrounds, plays a pivotal role in humans' life. It goes without saying that such a perfect circumstance will assist the young people to share ideas and opinions with other human beings; consequently, there is a possibility that creative ideas can burgeon in youths' mind. Even more, learning worthwhile and useful experiences of those who are in related to us will cause our resume to become more productive. Nowadays, employers require several skills and crafts from their employees instead of university evidence. For instance, when my friend was studying in the software engineering, she could get familiar with some archaeologists. During a summer, she had a chance to participate in their excavation. After this occurrence, she could write the computer codes associated with prediction of age of ancient materials on the site and now she is collaborating with several famous archaeologists. Thus, gaining more experience can be more practical than receiving a university paper.
The second reason for my argument is lies in the reality that it can be a kind of art to be created good friendship or relationship with others. One should notice that the perfect connection with living beings guide us to optimize our personality. Talking, discussing and cooperating with people will cause to humans' confidence increase spontaneously; hence, the young would take advantage of this situation. One of the constructive consequences this event is that a shy person will be able to improve his behavior in connecting with others; therefore, this person can attend with a high self-esteem in interview day.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that I strongly believe this conviction because advantages of a noticeable relationship include acquiring a huge number of experiences, boosting self-confidence and being prosperous in front of interviewers and list goes on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- tpo26 3
- tpo36 3
- Tpo42 82
- Do you agree or disagree?it is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31297709924 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06451763172 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605597964377 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3565173573 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.2 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187262328207 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676340602712 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734597249449 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110199119255 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847903328177 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.