Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities?
it is argued that for the successful future of a state, governments should focus to spend money on very young children's education especially five to ten years old, instead of spending on collages. In my opinion, I believe that early age education is crucial for growth, in particular in terms of improvement and sustainability.
On the one hand, improvement is, maybe, one of the most important values in educating step in young children. improvement is an increase of features in something to become more efficient and effective than the past. Thanks to this ability, one can be well educated particularly at a young age. Therefore, it is more valuable to teach someone in the first step. For example, if young children helped by the government more than older, children easily get boost themselves because of their needs for information. With all these educations, young brains will take the place of the future world and control this planet. So, basically, focusing on young children should not be skipped. one big step on this stage allows a serious effect on the development of a country.
In addition to improvement, sustainability is another noteworthy reason. sustainability is keeping alive what is observed, taken, learned and continuity for the future. Owing to this, one can stay profitable as long as supported by the government that exerted money to a young one. these expenses will have positive outcomes if we compare it with less money spend. because success always occurs when there is a struggle. this situation is not related to an expense for universities or buildings. this is an investment in future sustainability. For instance, in a school, the students reflect on the value of education, not the building or university name. After 10 years, tangible values may diminish, but intangible things like ideas, thoughts of young brains may be much more qualified and well designed because of government spendings on the past.
In a nutshell, when all the specific reasons and relevant examples are considered and evaluated, it can be concluded that governments spend money substantialy on young ages than on universities.
- Do u agree or disagreeIn twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone 80
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Tpo 27 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that for the successful futur...
^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Improvement
...es in educating step in young children. improvement is an increase of features in something...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...n young children should not be skipped. one big step on this stage allows a serious...
^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sustainability
...inability is another noteworthy reason. sustainability is keeping alive what is observed, take...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ment that exerted money to a young one. these expenses will have positive outcomes if...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...if we compare it with less money spend. because success always occurs when there is a s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...if we compare it with less money spend. because success always occurs when there is a s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...always occurs when there is a struggle. this situation is not related to an expense ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... expense for universities or buildings. this is an investment in future sustainabili...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15759312321 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99531520924 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570200573066 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5987387714 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374420230912 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950282426311 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812885382032 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232907942908 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568050849875 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.