Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of humankind, taking risk is the most controversial part to all of us, where success is the most common desire. Like a nature of lizard, the perspective from man to man varies. Somebody want to climb the ladder of success step by step in a very convenient way whereas, others want to accomplish it by challenging himself beyond the rest. I, one who advocates the after one for a few reasons demonstrated under.
The first justification for taking the risk is one of the bravest steps of the greatest personality of our history. As for example, I would like to remember our technological sensation "Sundar Pichai", the CEO of Google Inc., during the time of joining in Google who did not even heard their most considerable service "Gmail". But after joined there during the time of taking decision adjoining "Gmail" with a "Cloud Storage Server" made him falling in a great dilemma. In a strong possibility of losing the job, due to considerably the largest investment from Google that time only approved after him, he took. Today, his position defines as a consequence give him a unanimous recognition entire the world.
On top of that, Although trying new thing is always a challenging, life gets the relief of becoming bored. My father is a good example of this. After the marriage of him, for not getting adequate as salary to manage his additional expenses, decided to start a new business. My grandfather supported him as well as also in a great thought of worrying as my father was the only earner. He found him mislead within a couple of days, starting the business. He got really upset but decided not to end up without giving it the next try. And only because of that courage, considered as one of the successful business in our area for the time being. It was a great lesson, which helped me to wrap up my decision.
In addition to concluding I would like to say, In our entire universe, nothing is certain. So it is better to take the risk which could lead us to the end drawing a flourish accomplishment.
- “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 90
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the world cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statements? Use your examples to support. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:"It is better to use print materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet use specific reasons and examples to support your answer"
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- TPO:52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ective from man to man varies. Somebody want to climb the ladder of success step by ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cision adjoining 'Gmail' with a 'Cloud Storage Server' made h...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, so, well, whereas, as for, for example, in addition, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78055555556 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97676055387 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5900697731 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5789473684 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088788674846 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270450679485 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255932591152 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508460148887 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184736895021 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.