Some people think that people should keep doing what they know how to do well and some others thinks people should try new things and take risks in order to be succesfull. I personally, aggree with the second idea because of different reasons.
First of all, there is a general rule that we can apply to every field; the risk is bigger the benefit will be accordingly bigger. For instance, lets say you are an investor, if you limit yourself by investing a stable product, you will not either lose big or earn big. On the other hand, if you invest in a newly emerging product, you can earn more. But it does’t mean that you taking risk itself guarantee success, the risk should be quite logical.
The second reason is, you may be well in an area, but you never know how your performance will be in other fields. To be sure in which sector you will be successful you should try every sector as much as it is possible. For instance, I have a close friend. He was working in public sector. He tried a lot to get a higher position in this department but he failed. Then, he suddenly decided to establish his own bussiness. In a short period of time, he became very successful in this sector.
Lastly, trying different things can be seen as problematic behavior when a person lost all of them, but in time he will learn important things from every single lost and at the end he will learn how to be successful. There are a lot person who lost every time and keep triying and at the end be successful. Especially, the most successful person are such persons.
To conclude, trying different things and taking risks can be very educative for people. And taking risks can provide an important success. That is why, I think that people should keep trying new things although they are doing well in what they are doing at current.
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1980s not to suppress natural forest fires The quot let it burn quot policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summe 60
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1980s not to suppress natural forest fires The quot let it burn quot policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summe 60
- In the past century the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States birds in particular Unfortunately for birds these trends are likely to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...establish his own bussiness. In a short period of time, he became very successful in this sect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'people', 'persons'?
Suggestion: people; persons
...n how to be successful. There are a lot person who lost every time and keep triying an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, well, for instance, i think, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51951951952 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36001648 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507507507508 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5851460474 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2105263158 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296889451002 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905764270315 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135404986297 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216674203484 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183286669531 0.0645574589148 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.