In the reading passage, three kinds of damages of the “let it burn” policy are discussed by investigating the outcomes of Yellowstone. On the other hand, in the lecture, the lecturer tries to show how three arguments made in the reading passage are actually not true.
First of all, in the reading passage, it is written that the Yellowstone fires damaged the park’s trees and vegetation a lot. The lecturer opposes this idea and says that a lot of new vegetation emerged in the forest after the fires. This vegetation were some new species that were not seen before at that place and could grow up with the head that emerged after the fires. Thus, the biodiversity of the park increased the contrary to passage.
Secondly, in the passage, it is argued that the park’s wildlife is affected negatively by fires. However, in the lecture, it is said that a lot of new small animals (like rabbits) emerged in the park, as a consequence of the emerging small vegetation. These animals consume the small vegetation which emerged after the fires. By this development, some other animals which are predators of these newly emerged small animals come to the park also.
Last point, in the passage it is argued that fires decrease the value of parks as a tourist attraction. On the contrary, in the lecture, the speaker explains how the fires were unique for that year and in the following years, the conditions for such a big fire didn’t emerge again. Thus, in following years the park continued to be an important tourist attraction place and local businesses continued to benefit from the park’s touristic potential.
- In the past century the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States birds in particular Unfortunately for birds these trends are likely to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news sources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1980s not to suppress natural forest fires The quot let it burn quot policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summe 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... emerged small animals come to the park also. Last point, in the passage it is argu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 276.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88768115942 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60537983714 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481884057971 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9748421817 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.769230769 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701410208733 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291215916445 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412495926701 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469831504481 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290897605462 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.