Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In a team, those who do not accept others’ criticism cannot succeed.
In this sophisticated world in which people lead hectic life, human beings have perpetually sook was to succeed. In this regard, the disputative question which always has caused heated debates is whether accepting other's criticism is a key factor of prosperous in a team or not. It is a great discord among people as if some people possess the conviction that without accepting others criticism, individual will not thrive. While, others hold an alternative perspective and alleged that it is dispensable that one accept those criticisms. I personally subscribe to the first idea and believe that the way of fulfillment aims goes through admitting others' criticism. Further discussion on this topic can be boiled down to a couple of upcoming reasons below.
First and foremost, the essence of team work is considering and scrutinizing all the aspects and the notions of all the members. Meanwhile, if there is someone who do not accept others convictions and insist on his idea firmly, not only may cause the team-work to be interrupted, but the person will become secluded as well. As a matter of fact, if the person make no attention to others instructive notions, others will not consider her point of view in response. Consequently, the spirit of collaboration will be deviated, and accomplishment will not be achieved. Moreover, the person who have never acknowledged others point of view, could have never found out his mistakes and her negative point; hence, he would not have the opportunity to purify himself and wipe out her erroneous ,which is an undeniable factor to boost himself and flourish. Regarding this issue, there is a striking consensus among researchers that the more person, in a team, embrace others critics and attempt to efface them, the more prosper he would be, and the more achievement the group will attain.
The second worthwhile reason which deserves some words here is that by doing team work people would be prepare for attending in a society. It is no axiomatic that team work is a full-fledged practice to be a proper citizen. On the one hand, in each society peoples are obliged to admit some rules; otherwise, they would be punished. on the other hand, if each person were selfish without considering others opinion and critics in teamwork, he/ she would violate the rules in the society as well, which would bring about disorganized in society. Due to their involvement in feasible predicaments in the society, under no circumstance, would these people embrace a fruitful and pacify life, let alone being prosperous. Take a personal experience to illustrate this issue; back in high school I used to ignoring others’ criticisms in team works, and I just persist on my viewpoint. This have gave rise to some dilemmas observing rules in society. Had I been more modest, admitting and executing rules in the society would not be such burdensome today. Then, to thrive and achieve lucrative life in the society without breaching rules, members of team had better practice to behold their defects and the plausible erroneous through others sight and make effort to reclaim them rather than oppose and getting angry.
To make a long story short, all the above reasons lead us to conclusion that one of crucial factors that people should not underestimate in a team to succeed is admitting others critic. It should be taken into account that, when people lead a hectic life accept others' criticisms paved the way to succeed. It is highly recommended that in each group, members respect to others notion about themselves to remove their mistake and eventually fulfill the subject of team giving rise to prosperous of individual in long last.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-06 | Thomas2028 | 71 | view |
2020-08-22 | f.heido | 73 | view |
2017-11-15 | mehrdad.imnnn | 72 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has greater influence on people s lives than television has 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 90
- At one high school more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments The school is considering making a change to 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents do not understand their children as well as parents did 50 years ago 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...sed heated debates is whether accepting others criticism is a key factor of prosperous...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...s the conviction that without accepting others criticism, individual will not thrive. ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 787, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...urify himself and wipe out her erroneous ,which is an undeniable factor to boost h...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
...epare for attending in a society. It is no axiomatic that team work is a full-fled...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...les; otherwise, they would be punished. on the other hand, if each person were sel...
^^
Line 3, column 889, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
...just persist on my viewpoint. This have gave rise to some dilemmas observing rules i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 889, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...just persist on my viewpoint. This have gave rise to some dilemmas observing rules i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1159, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice beholding'.
Suggestion: practice beholding
...ching rules, members of team had better practice to behold their defects and the plausible erroneo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, well, while, as to, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3070.0 1977.66487455 155% => OK
No of words: 611.0 407.700716846 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02454991817 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74053043105 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 314.0 212.727598566 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513911620295 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 951.3 618.680645161 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9132357368 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.916666667 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4583333333 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190114893114 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574932092489 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048685081884 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129086058073 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218853659309 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 86.8835125448 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.