Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nobody can deny that Television programs have a crucial effect on children's behavior. Advertisements shown during Television programs that their main audiences are young children are no exception to this. In this regard, commercials’ designers should deliberate on producing advertisements much more meticulously. I do believe that advertising which their target group is children have to be banned. I cling to this viewpoint for two main reasons and will shed upon them in the following:
As the first and most paramount reason, the producers of Television commercials exert bright colors and cartoons' characters to tempt young children. They are taking advantages of the lack of children's Knowledge. For instance, when a cellphone company advertises its product throughout children's TV programs, it uses colorful and pleasure scenes to show them how attractive the telephone is and how they can enjoy calling their friends. The young who do not have information about the trick applied by the company, require their parents to buy the cellphone. This example demonstrates how advertisements can misuse young children.
Moreover, since young children cannot determine the difference between the false and the truth, commercials can significant effects on their lifestyle. They readily pursue what they see and hear in advertisements without the consideration of their negative consequences. My nephew, for example, watched a cartoon called Frozen when he was four. Frozen was the most famous and popular TV program through which varied unhealthy junk food's advertisements were shown. He did not have anything apart from chips, fruit strips, candies, and soda. Therefore, his parents could not prevent him from eating that harmful food. As a result, he has suffered from obesity and diabetes. If he had not watched those advertisements, he would not have been addicted to eating detrimental food.
It might be said that there some positives to broadcasting advertisements during children's Television shows, most notably their contribution to the development of children's verbal skills and to entertaining children. Despite this, it seems for many parents, these pleasures are outweighed by issues which have a negative effect on children's lives.
In conclusion, considering the foregoing points and examples, I firmly agree that running commercials during the youth has to be prevented. Not can only it be considered as taking advantage of children, but it also affects their lifestyle negatively.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 rezamousavi666 66 view
2020-01-11 nusybah 76 view
2020-01-05 jiyakavya 60 view
2019-12-30 jason_linnil 60 view
2019-12-27 Bobby1987 86 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Mahsaio :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd will shed upon them in the following: As the first and most paramount reason, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
...ozen was the most famous and popular TV program through which varied unhealthy junk foo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...th has to be prevented. Not can only it be considered as taking advantage of child...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55091383812 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08348348341 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595300261097 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9349770009 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.238095238 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188066244175 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576914539383 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049310772119 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113760393461 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527416240733 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.