Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my opinion, we should not go to colleges or universities just for studying. We can go there to learn different things from educational subjects. In my view, sport and social activities are as crucial as classes and libraries. These activities have some benefits for everyone that I want to mention.
First of all, sport is really useful for people. We can get energy, become motivate, have a healthy diet and life, participate in different competition and fa from illness with sport. For instance, when I was a university student, I did sport before my difficult classes, so I got energy, and become motivate to study. Besides, I have followed a healthy diet because of my sport class, so now I am too powerful and in shape.
Second, social activities can aspect us with a new point of view. This activity makes us responsible and patient. In addition, we can make different friends, and try to help others. When I was a student, one of my friends encouraged me going to attend social activities to collected trash from the nature. Before that, I did not care about the nature, and sometimes I threw garbage, but after that class I got regret, I have become careful about everything in the world since then. Moreover, before that activity, I could not make friends easily, but after that, when I met some people who were so friendly, I could make friends whit them very quickly, and I have become patient.
As a result, I do agree with this statement, and I am willing to devote budget to support these activities. I know sport and social activities are extremely hard for some students, but it worthwhile. If I were in charge, I absolutely dedicate money to support sport and social activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | younessam | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | Dat_Nguyen | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | Muggle | 90 | view |
- tpo53 do you agree or disagree that the governments should spend more money to improve internet access more than improving public transportation 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Tpo51- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery quickly, and I have become patient. As a result, I do agree with this statem...
^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to support sport and social activities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73737373737 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71118002257 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538720538721 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0645537886 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7647058824 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192871485464 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690886937175 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546107904341 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131224013406 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645393493274 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.