In a person’s life, there will always be problems and difficulties. Many people prefer to resolve hard times with friends or family. But others choose to solve difficult times alone. In my opinion I agree with the statement that is better to have the aid of a group to settle an obstacle. I will support my judgment on the following paragraphs.
First, I believe in the idea that “more heads think better than one”. And with this I mean that if you have friends or relatives that could assist you in a difficulty, each one of them will bring new ideas and creative ways to solve the issue. Instead, if you try to solve anything by yourself, you wouldn’t have the same number of possibilities that a group can provide you. For example, if a president has to make an important decision in order to resolve a difficult issue, he will always enquire his ministers and people who he trust. Because they all are going to think the best and creative way to get out of that situation. Even if the president has the best intention to make the right choice, he or she will always need the assessment of more people.
Secondly, I will point out that people around you have more experiences than you. If you put together all the bad and good experiences from your fellows and close family, you could have a lot of advises. Therefore, you could have the opportunity to pick one or two advises that are better to resolve your issue. My own experience is the best example of this. I remember once I was having troubles getting my drive licence approved. So I decided to ask my friends and cousins about it because they have already taken the driving exam. They filled me with a diversity of advises and instructions on how I could pass the test. They all mentioned their bad and good experiences, so at the end I was more confident to take the driving test.
In conclusion, rather you prefer to solve a problem by your own or with other people, it is up to you. But for me, there are more positive aspects of solving a problem with a group of people. Because they have the capacity to provide you more suggestions, ideas and experiences that could help you to make the best decision.
- Integrated Writing: Conflict approach and fulfillment approach 3
- In some organizations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organizations, promotions are based on promotion. Discuss the advantage of each position. Then indicate which position do you think is best and why? 63
- various types of motivation along with example 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solution that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Haste makes Waste Use specific reasons or example to support your response 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
In a persons life, there will always be problems and...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'trusts'.
Suggestion: trusts
...s ask their ministers and people who he trust. Because they all are going to think th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, i mean, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47300771208 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49611880777 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480719794344 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1851914168 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275129208519 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846175294164 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704652720622 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196435626904 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707333667773 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.