Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Almost everyone acknowledges the benefits of team works and have come to believe that for many purposes we need to utilize the productive potential of participating in the groups. However, a controversial question is about its effectiveness for school students; whether they learn much more working on their assignments in a group or they get better results to work alone? Personally speaking, It seems more reasonable if they are asked to focus on their work apart from a group as it lessens time working on the projects, benefits them mastering all facets of the assignment, and keeps them away from being manipulated by some negligent students.
First, the group members scatter each others time and energy. In one hand, they initially distribute the responsibilities as everyone bring some part of the work which assists them to conserve time. On the other hand, the group should take its time to share the ideas and information and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does not weigh more than working alone which you do not need to put such energy and time for delivering what you worked on and try to make them perceive your points of view.
Second, some students do not eager to take any burden on their shoulders and evade from working as hard as you do. Indeed, they use the teamwork to cover up their irresponsibility as finally, the group will compromise their negligence and makeup for them to get an excellent mark. In the end, they get justified evenly, and the inattentive person of the group will win his/her manipulative purposes. Although, <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">they would not get the chance</span> to take advantage of other students if they were asked to submit their assignments by their own.
Third, sometimes the groups do not devote enough time to share their idea thoroughly, and the members who have issues understanding some piece of the concepts may be left behind. Allegedly, the sense of group working halts them to push themselves harder to comprehend what they do not. Nevertheless, those students would have studied harder comparatively, to find the best way of solving that puzzle if they were asked to work on their own.
All in all, I must admit that working alone by default will lead one to focus ampler while the time from baffling in a group and serves that preserved time to work on the sections which are challenging to comprehend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 90
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 90
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement people who move out of their native village or towns are more successful and happier than people who stay in their native villages or towns. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... First, the group members scatter each others time and energy. In one hand, they init...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: why's
...d information and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: how's
...rmation and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does not we...
^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...n and convince others about whys, hows, whats, etc. Admittedly, it does not weigh mor...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 203, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprehending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: comprehending
...k on the sections which are challenging to comprehend.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01481481481 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95891286981 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535802469136 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0371417605 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248686571202 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892954993906 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682963073543 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143123566887 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353031578159 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.