In the modern era, group work is regarded as a crucial factor contributing to the thriving of people as individuals or a community. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the importance of doing class projects as a group or individually. Many people adhere to the view that students learn better on their own, while others believe working as a gathering yields to a more preferable outcome. I firmly believe working in a group is more convenient. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that people can solve their problems and misunderstandings using the help of other members. It is ubiquitous not to understand some parts of the professor’s lecture during the class period. So, students can use their partner’s assistance to clear up those gray areas and avoid carrying them to their exam sessions. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Two years ago, I had to work on a project with one of my friends for the computer architecture course. During the implementation process, I found out that I did not have sufficient comprehension of a rudimentary point that was essential for the project. My partner aided me to fully settle my predicament, and not only we got a proper grade in the project, but also the same question repeated at the final exam and I triumphed to answer it without any difficulties.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that social behaviors will be adapted during group activities which are vital for our future interactions with our associates. Dealing with others is a practical skill that can not be learned just by reading books. Members would learn prerequisite skills for their participation in bigger communities by practicing patience, creativity, and responsibility within a group, alongside the development of their academic skills. For instance, when I was an undergraduate student, I had to take plenty of courses that group activity was accounted for an essential portion of their final marks. I tried to join different people to become acquainted with a variety of characteristics, find new friends, and develop my personality so that I could solve the conflicting notions peacefully. As a result, I do not have any problem with my co-workers in my current company, thus everybody is eager to cooperate with me.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that working as a group is much more beneficial than doing the tasks individually. Because people’s questions can be detected and solved, plus it fabulously enhances our social behaviors which are necessary for our future professional relationships.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 75
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign language. 90
- Do yo agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... adhere to the view that students learn better on their own, while others believe work...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16294642857 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22560553241 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569196428571 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6237034191 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.65 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165714052032 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511543379521 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038843891596 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106104511174 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289501781028 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.