Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Good teachers set challenging tasks for their students.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree with the idea that teachers who are giving their students with challenging tasks are good teachers because they know that putting no limits and continuous practices make their students perfect and prepare for the future.
First of all, good teachers know that practices make people perfect. Therefore, they assign hard homework and tasks for their students to make them valuable ones in the future. Challenging tasks can teach many things for students, not only about the task's outcome. Students need to work hard to complete the task. Working hard does not easy because it requires physical and mental energies such as sitting for a quite some time and thinking deeply. These kinds of practices develop students’ personal abilities that can help them to deal with many problems in their future life. This is one of the key factors that teachers should teach their students, and good teachers teach it for their children in their own ways such as homework with hard tasks.
Furthermore, good teachers know that there should be no barriers for students such as I cannot do this and it is not a thing that I can solve. An immature person has thoughts about their strength and pretends to set a limit themselves. Children might not think about breaking the limit. Thus, teachers play a key role to solve this barrier issue. Good teachers can help students to pass their limits by challenging tasks that are bigger than their limit. For instance, when I was an elementary school student, I was overweight. I did not want to play team sports because of my overweight. However, my teacher made me join a soccer club. Saruul, one of my friends, and I often went to a park with a soccer ball and enjoyed kicking the ball. After school, we had a team practice and run around a playground. Our coach gave us a lot of feedback and taught us strategies and tactics. I spent much time to practice. As a result, I reduced my overweight and became one of the good soccer players in my school. I could deal with my barrier by challenging it.
In summary, I strongly consider that good teachers set challenging tasks for their student to make them successful in the future. I recommend that every teacher should challenge their students with hard tasks.
- High school students should be required to study many different subjectsat the same time or they should study only three or four subjects at a time. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A good sense of humor is one of the most important human qualities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Good teachers set challenging tasks for their students.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Childhood is the happiest time of a person’s life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tasks'' or 'task's'?
Suggestion: tasks'; task's
...things for students, not only about the tasks outcome. Students need to work hard to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79743589744 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50067840894 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0192667088 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9583333333 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291860107715 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847409700635 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764697099029 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225102460599 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366045828114 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.