Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources
Nowadays we live in the information age. Technology has revolutionized every aspect of human’s life including the way of gaining information. There are more sources now to be informed about current affairs. Therefore there is an ongoing debate that it’s better to get most information from diverse news supplies to be well-informed. I support this idea and I well elaborate this more in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, using just one source to get information may provide us data which is not reliable. Some kind of newspaper or news program on TV are biased and give partial information therefore if we want to have a better understanding of issues which are happening around us we’d better check other sources as well. For example, some news sources are in favor of a special political party so when comes to election they may give us prejudiced data in order to deceive people and make a better impression of their favorite candidate. There is a common expression that says the listener should be wise which means we shouldn’t believe everything we hear but we should challenge it and make sure that the information is correct.
Secondly, different sources may see the same issue from different points of view so obtaining data from various resources gives us a comprehensive understanding of the topic. Each reporter may look at the subject from special angle. So if we stick to one source we cannot be sure that we know everything about it. For example about long cancer as a common health issue some sources may say that it’s just because the air pollution so people who live in a place with a cleaner air are not endanger but other sources may provide information that it’s also the matter of genetic and genetic plays an important role as well as environment. So relying on just one source may provide us incomplete information of a topic.
In conclusion, I would say that we should take advantage of this great opportunity that technology has brought us and use different sources of news both to have a comprehensive knowledge of what happens around the world and to avoid being fooled by some sources and get the most correct information about various topics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...w to be informed about current affairs. Therefore there is an ongoing debate that it&apos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...look at the subject from special angle. So if we stick to one source we cannot be sur...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'endangered'.
Suggestion: endangered
...e in a place with a cleaner air are not endanger but other sources may provide informati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97574123989 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87817110425 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.4171566807 48.9658058833 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7333333333 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233558931832 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891865067651 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565444595752 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160928579397 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396506439077 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.