Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
In man's history, humans are found to be curious about events around them the enviroment where they live. Plus, always valuable information bring about they thrive in their personal life. Therefore, the key point to be mention is reliability of information. Then, the question of whether a person must to lean on different news resources to be sure and well-informed. I strongly confirm followed statement by pinpoint some outstanding grounds in next paragraphs.
First of all, Minority of news resources are sophisticated and try to cover all happening and crucial events all around the world. As a wise person can accept, the more resources to refer to, the more confident one can be about the news. Similarly, as an example, people in their social life hear different news from about whom they know. Subsequently, if they seek to find the accurate information, they definetely will pursu it through relevant people who can provide excessive coroborating information.
Furthermore, as diverse counries following policies which bring them their own benefit, they broadcast various kind of news in such a profitable way. For this reason they send out modified news to persuade at least their local people as much as they can. In order to get more relaxed by trustworthiness of assorted sources, one should weigh all gotten information and investigate them rationally. As one of my own exprience, when I was a student in highschool, I was hearing a probable upcoming earthquake by others which made me frithening. Afterward, I asked alot about it to get sure, eventually, I realized that that was all rumor.
To put all aforementioned arguments into nutshell, one has to be aware about which and how many resoures or news network he is attending. Because, firstly to take persuassive confidence about news and to analyse them in logical manner which raises its plausibility.
- integrated essay -TPO 41 85
- Why go to university? 73
- “Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.” 60
- Do you agree or disagree?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- integrated essay tpo 42 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In mans history, humans are found to be...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...on is reliability of information. Then, the question of whether a person must to lean on different new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation. Then, the question of whether a person must to lean on different news ...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...Then, the question of whether a person must to lean on different news resources to be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 464, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., when I was a student in highschool, I was hearing a probable upcoming earthquake by other...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, at least, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99030143748 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624183006536 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0803296327 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.875 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19414811248 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650479331139 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638056995197 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11883120592 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615925349624 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.