Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, we are living in an increasingly changing world and the age of information. The changing speed of information is so high that no one can survive in the information age. Some people gather the required information from just one resource; however, some others do not satisfy with one information resources and expand their knowledge by referring to several resources. I personally believe that the latter is more rational for a couple of reasons.
First, no information resources are not comprehensive enough to represent all information is required about a certain issue. For exmaple, while the world wide web represent information about different things in the world, it lacks the knowledge individual can gather when he refer to libraries to make use of ancient books. What's more, an another example, nothing can be replaced by visual information and this matter is especially crucial for artist. To illustrate, take an artist can get information by attending a museum of galley, compared to the time he spend about artistic works in the internet. It undoubtely makes sense that no information resources are not comprehensive.
Besides mentioned reason, some resources are biased to present information to the readers. There are a variety of reasons underlying presenting biased information such as owed to a political party, competion between opponents, to name a few. For instance, regarding the historical events, there are different viewpoints about every event; some individuals who are regarded heros in one history book, in other books regarded evils. This condition is widely true about political matters nowadays. In fact, the biased or misconcepted information are abundant today and the same thing necessitates to gather information from several reliable resources.
Last but not least, the temporal availability of every resources makes one to make use of different resources. To utilize books one need to go to library, while libraries are not always near the place we live. Also, the limitation to use other resources are aboundant. Fo example, the internet, as a great resource of information make cost to accompany us in our cellphones or finding reliable resources on the internet sometimes take a long time. Under these circumtances, it makes sense to get advantages of different resources.
In light of the aforementioned details, I would believe that the information gathering strtegy should be expanded to different resources. In fact, making use of a variety of resources decrease the risk of trapping into an incomprehensive, biased, and limited resource. Since the, it is possible to concentrate filter unwanted or invaluable information from database.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | shrijan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mobinzaarreh | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | bbbbaaakkk | 60 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparentswere children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 97
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'refers'.
Suggestion: refers
...knowledge individual can gather when he refer to libraries to make use of ancient boo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...libraries to make use of ancient books. Whats more, an another example, nothing can b...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an example' or 'another example'.
Suggestion: an example; another example
... make use of ancient books. Whats more, an another example, nothing can be replaced by visual info...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...seum of galley, compared to the time he spend about artistic works in the internet. I...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mation resources are not comprehensive. Besides mentioned reason, some resources...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ariety of resources decrease the risk of trapping into an incomprehensive, biased...
^^
Line 9, column 277, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...ve, biased, and limited resource. Since the, it is possible to concentrate filter un...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42755344418 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09036626133 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532066508314 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2519254782 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.863636364 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154711710438 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493058928964 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379938872032 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941862887616 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141419427108 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.