Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, changes in transportation systems are frequent all over the world. Personally, I believe with the advancements of modern era there will be more cars on roads in the future than we have today. I believe this for two reasons which I will be exploring throughout the following essay.
First of all, populating is growing all over the world and cars are becoming enriched with modern technologies which in turn bringing more and more cars to usage. For instance, I live in dhaka the capital of Bangladesh where population density was 1000 per kilometers in the year of 2000 which is now 3500, to support transportation facilities for the vast population the government has introduced more cars. In a recent report, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics showed that the number of cars at Dhaka city are now 10 times more than it was in the year 2000. In addition, people are getting fascinated by more technologically advanced cars. The car makers, alluring peoples to buy their latest models which offers more control and comfort in the road. For example, my one of my younger cousin is very fond of new cars, he has bought 5 cars in last 10 years. As a result, with the invention of electric, driverless and so many other exciting features people are buying more and more cars over time.
Secondly, cars are becoming inexpensive and availability of cars in the market are also playing a vital role to push more cars in use day by day. With modern scientific inventions, cars are becoming cheaper over time. For example a typical 3000cc SUV was around 80,00,000 BDT in the year of 2000 which is now around 50,00,000 BDT which results in increased affordability. To be more specific, in my family 10 years ago we had only one car used by all the 7 members. Now we have 10 cars for 12 members of our family, where I believe the reduction of prices contributed at a greater extent. Additionally, so many models from diverse manufacturers are available in the market which provides customers with a range of choices based on their budget. For instance, in Bangladesh there were only 5 branded car available during the year of 2000 where now around 25 brands car flourished the market. As a result people are having more options to choose based on their demand and budget.
In conclusion, with the development of modern, comformable, and more technically advanced cars with a lot of manufacturers we can easily forsee a huge increase in number of cars in usage in the near future.
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 65
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 800, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'car' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cars'.
Suggestion: cars
...in Bangladesh there were only 5 branded car available during the year of 2000 where...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77906976744 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78382972724 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504651162791 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1364667914 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.157894737 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170654848984 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608540112461 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488972888819 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124563900509 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441218923472 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.