do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
people learn things better from those at their own level -such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those of higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
This argumentative issue plays a major role in our educational stages of life. Whether to gain skills from our mentors and professors of high standing levels of society or the community that we are dealing with each day may provide us either a great deal of knowledge or a great portion of time wasted. From my vantage point, people who are associated with higher skills and understanding in any ground of science, religion, art or so seem more practical and useful for us to learn from. Their ample deal of experience, lack of the competency intentions and the positive preconception concerning to them are the factors which by no means can be neglected.
To begin with, individuals at higher levels comparing to us are much more competent than anyone else. They are characterized with brilliant experiences regarding to their field of study or skill that brought them to those levels. Thereby, these figures act better and are more contributive for us to learn from. For example, by a quick glance of a university classes we will see professors teaching their apprentices and will be convinced that they are more reliable to learn from instead of young tutors.
Similarly, these people are not of competing us. They only get paid by teaching their students and there would be no need to compete their students. In contrast, people of the same stage or age as us may show some unprofessional and competitive attributes that harm our learning. This is a fact that no one can turn a blind eye to. For instance, as we know youngsters would compare themselves with their same level tutors repeatedly. Therefore, in case of learning from each other, they may encounter their counterparts dictating them or even insulting them that will definitely trigger to not attaining proper lessons of that course.
Last but not least, since we know that our professor or our teacher has a better command of knowledge than us, it would help us to trust them and learn more quickly. Otherwise, we will spend a quiet time to persuade ourselves whether the person is competent enough to teach us or nor. This positive preconception act a conducive role to our learning more efficiently.
Under no circumstance would one gain appropriate skills from the same level of knowledge. Higher experience, no need of competing and the decent preconception of learning from higher level individuals are the factors that seems adequately convincing. Professors and teachers are more apt to be employed in case of conveying knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-10 | Alneon0094 | 76 | view |
- imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. the teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your pinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait the class or the meeting is ov 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them, today young people are better able to make decision for their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to sup 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer . 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97619047619 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86150460716 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1338209196 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23400669739 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742835041011 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050231888334 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143502690389 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398614136549 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.