workers are more satisfied when they have many different tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer .
Having repetitive tasks would be the most undesirable thing for employees. In contrast, busyness by doing diverse sort of affairs seems more satisfying to workers. Similar tasks will make workers more tired, employees’ lack of creativity and almost nothing particular will they learn.
First and for most, it has proven that series of similar duties on a work day would make workers undeniably bored. For example, imagine an employee who works5 days a week, 8 hours each day. This person by only doing repetitive tasks is akin to a robot, which is able to what he is planned for. This person end up being exhausted and tired of his work any soon.
On the other hand, in terms of being innovative at workplace, one needs to be exposed to different sort of tasks. A repetitive checklist which forces workers of a firm doing similar affairs will definitely trigger to a striking failure. In contrary, a flourishing firm is where the employees can be creative. For instance, Google with hundreds of hundred engineers and employees from all over the world has claimed that the company owe its triumph to abundance of creativity of its people working there. People are more prone to work brightly by being innovative in their works. Where they can freely think, spread their ideas, sharing their different approaches to specific dilemmas and so forth.
Last but not least, if CEOs and supervisors offer their employees similar weekly task, when would workers learn other vital affairs? By having our workers doing varied jobs they will need to learn more skills and more solutions. Albeit, it may seem formidable to them, learning from new challenges is worthy of support. For example, I remember a brilliant architecture firm which is founded and raised in Northern California. The CEO acknowledged their success by circulating the architects' tasks on a monthly routine. Meaning that, one will work on other task of planning a project in comparison to both last and upcoming month. Therefore, whole the firm will encounter different aspects of projects. Accordingly, all of the architects in that particular firm have a well command of finishing a project and by learning and experiencing diverse set of skills they are more satisfied working.
To make the long story short, satisfactory is reachable only by granting our workers different arrays of tasks through the week. New tasks won't make them bored, will need their creativity and learning new stuff.
- some people believe that when busy parents don't have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and exa 80
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer . 83
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 715, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...erent aspects of projects. Accordingly, all of the architects in that particular firm have...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06650246305 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68561584306 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1565570873 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4347826087 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.652173913 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267088067528 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720195604292 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554294286978 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152187923367 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591734047046 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.