Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that the teachers have critical impact on students, especially in the contemporary era, which the educational system contributes a leading part in every single student's life and future. No one can gainsay its significance. However, a controversial question is often raised regarding to this issue is whether teachers should make their attitudes known to students or not. From my own perspective, I think teachers should make their social and political views known to students. I have numerous reasons why I have confidence in this opinion elaborating cogently in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason coming to mind consolidating my standpoint is that teachers need to reveal their attitudes for the students, because they are teaching them the ethics and morals principles. In other words, they have to elaborate which view is the right one for students so that they understand the world better. To be more specific, I should express that the elementary school teachers, and high school teachers, must exhibit their viewpoints and explain the right and wrong principles for the students. Psychologically speaking, the individuals, specifically students under the age of 16, do not developed recognition ability in order to distinguish the appropriate and canonical moralities. Thus, instructors can guide them to choose right path among all other diverted directions thorough expressing their attitudes as the right one.
The other reason which deserves some words here advocating my viewpoint is that students usually consider their teachers as an inspiration, and role model. Hence, it is sort of accepted that teachers veneer them by revealing their own social and political attitudes. In this regard, the educational system can hope to foster generations who are completely following the common values. As a result, we can observe a unity and cohesion in the whole structure of society which can be really pivotal in order to achieve greater goals. This view took its inspiration from so called functionalism theory in the sociology, which is mentions that all the parents and other role models such as teachers need to express their attitudes for their children and educate them the values and ethics so that the society could reach the ultimate solidarity.
To put briefly, I disagree with the primary statement, and I guess teachers should reveal themselves for students. Because they are the role models for them and need to steer students to the right direction. Plus, instructors should teach students the moral principles. Thus, it is necessary for them to make their social or political views exhibit in the classroom. In nutshell, in fact, there are multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, which could be alluded, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time. Finally it is suggested that a survey be conducted to find out whether revealing teachers attitudes for students can be useful or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shrijan | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Today students more interested in politic. 83
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Should a factory built in your community? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is no doubt that the teachers have...
^^^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...tributes a leading part in every single students life and future. No one can gainsay its...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students, because they are teaching them the ethics and morals principles. In oth...
^^
Line 4, column 740, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...s, instructors can guide them to choose right path among all other diverted direction...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of society which can be really pivotal in order to achieve greater goals. This ...
^^
Line 8, column 548, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...not embraced due to the dearth of time. Finally it is suggested that a survey be conduc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, really, regarding, so, thus, i guess, i think, in fact, no doubt, sort of, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31289640592 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91054096315 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496828752643 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8130961237 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5238095238 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252090232758 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081805094526 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758760902886 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162864204799 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456115468621 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.