Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although some people suggest that teachers receive more appreciation since they are responsible for educaing people in the highly competitive society nowadays, I firmly reckon that teachers were more appreciated and valued in the past. Detailed reasons will be illustrated in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, people in the past treasured and praised the importance of respecting senior people including teachers; therefore, teachers in the past were appreciated more than they are nowadays. For instance, when my parents once compare how they educated me and how their parents educated them, they suggested that grandfather told them to respect the old and teachers. However, they said that this kind of value is hardly important at all nowadays. In other words, students and teachers should have equal status.
Secondly, there are an increasingly amount of educational resources available online for free, which means teachers are not the only channel to get educated in modern times. Teachers are not as important as before, and so they receive less appreciation nowadays. A simple illustration for this is open course wares. Many institutes, such as MIT, Stanford and UC Bekerly, publish thier class recordings and lecture notes to the Internet nowadays. Therefore, students including I nowadays frequently utilize these resources more and even claim that the resources online is better than their original teachers. As a consequence, teachers are less appreciated today.
Last but not least, with the advent of technology, many teachers cannot afford an up-to-date educational materials and a high-quality teaching, which makes them being less valued day. Traditionally, teachers usually speciallized in certain subjects and focused on teaching students how to acquire high scores in exams. By contrast, nowadays teachers are required to offer more comprensive teaching and materials, such as leadership and career path planning, to make students competitive in the society. This tough requirement makes teachers burnt-out and they usually cannot provide such materials students need. As a result, since they cannot achieve what the student needs, teachers are less valued in the modern society.
In conclusion, from the aforementioned reasons, I strongly agree with the idea that teachers were appreciated and valued in the past than they are nowadays.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- People are easier to get educated today than in the past 70
- TPO 28 Integrated 81
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away--Wait until the class or meeting i 85
- Which is more important for a school To buy new equipment or hire famous teachers 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
... equal status. Secondly, there are an increasingly amount of educational resources available onli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 37, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
... Secondly, there are an increasingly amount of educational resources available onli...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61944444444 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86598694569 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0447060027 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.388888889 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287928274075 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965107365329 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938250483864 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205515973684 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092123439795 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.