Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development and achievement of technology in contemporary society, we can learn a large amount of information and knowledge by searching on the internet. People begin to doubt whether the position of teachers nowadays is as important as the society in the past. There are many aspects to dwell on when it comes to the issue stated in out prompt, Faced with the tough choice, I personally disagrees with the statement.
In the first place, it is more efficient for students to learn knowledge from teachers. Asking questions from someone who knows your problems is the most efficient way to get the point of what we do not understand. For example, my brother, who is a teacher teaching Japanese. Whenever I have the problems about the Japanese grammar, he can explain the concepts in a very short time and help me dealing with the problems. That is, because he know what mistake students will make, so he can answer this question in an easier, clear way to students.
In the second place, teachers plays an important role in delivering the message which is right, and still have the irreplaceable value in society. There are lots of fake news on the internet in order to appeal people's attention or make profits by those fake news. Most of us have the experiences of been cheated. Only teachers can tell us the really truthful information. Hence, teachers today are still appreciated and valued in our society.
Admittedly, some people might have doubts about the teacher's value today. We can use a variety of tools to search for information we need without asking teachers, such as, internet, journals, papers on websites. However, I still insist that teacher is of vita importance to the society. Through their experiences and knowledge, we can learn things deeply, truly, and broadly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'disagree'
Suggestion: disagree
...ced with the tough choice, I personally disagrees with the statement. In the first p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to deal' or 'deal'.
Suggestion: to deal; deal
...ncepts in a very short time and help me dealing with the problems. That is, because he ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
... with the problems. That is, because he know what mistake students will make, so he ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, really, second, so, still, well, for example, such as, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95723684211 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69736641528 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1713530575 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6470588235 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151671740685 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488872924367 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037292710898 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089251290865 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036788499323 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.