Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reason and examples to support your answer
Increase in digitization has affected all walks of life, making it more simple and optimized. Children are actively adapting towards digitization, not only using it but creating it as well. I disagree with the statement and believe that the technology has made children more creative and intelligent than in past. Technology make them more connected, efficient
Connecting with friends over social network is very common use case of Technology. Children can connect with each other on digital media and can solve important issues together. For instance, the recent space game app launch by NASA which encourages Children to join together and provide their ideas to solve simple space stations problems. This act instills creativity in them by thinking out of the box and provide the solution. The more creative the solution is, the better is the prize money.
Children today are far more efficient than those in the past. They can use technology to simplify their daily life. For instance, for learning a new material they don’t need to visit brick and mortar libraries anymore, they just access the digital library and get their work done. Simple tools can enable them to make their own search algorithms, to search the respective book they are looking for.
Lot of creative apps like creative painting, learning English using doodle etc motivates students to learn in a more better and creative way. Instead of hour long boring classroom lessons, they can now learn from digital platforms that include animations, different combination of lightning to explain the concept. This way of learning is a lot more fun and encourages children to learn the concept and think about it in a creative manner.
Summarizing the above points, I believe that technology has a positive impact on children life, making it more better, enthusiastic and creative as compared to that in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-17 | ashish150395 | 76 | view |
- Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 60
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to hold a bigparty and invite many people to come than a small party where only a few closefriends and family members are invited 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Reading is more educational than watching movies or TV.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...dren more creative and intelligent than in past. Technology make them more connected, e...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...le etc motivates students to learn in a more better and creative way. Instead of hour long ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 418, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a creative manner" with adverb for "creative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to learn the concept and think about it in a creative manner. Summarizing the above points, I belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...tive impact on children life, making it more better, enthusiastic and creative as compared ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, thus, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16938110749 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62119674345 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1231529117 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186331643666 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733847715851 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868248563068 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113952483402 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463896962319 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.