Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
No one can deny that there are both advantages and disadvantages of using technology by children. However, if it was mandatory to choose between the effect of using technology for children has made children less creative or not, I would strongly disagree with the statement. I believe that technology has created a good opportunity to enhance the creativity of children. I feel this way for two reasons which I will endeavor to explain in the following essay.
To begin with, using technology is an effective way to express the inner feelings of children. If you want to figure out this proof, just compare with you with the present generation's children. For example, when I was a student of Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, I had a 4th standard English medium student. I was astonished to know the plan of his life because he thought that he is a little scientist. He had a secret laboratory in his apartment and he reserved a lot of instruments there. I had a curiosity to know about his interest to do it and I was not ready to hear it from him. He told me that he has a YouTube channel and he knew those strategies from YouTube. He was a great fan of Einstien and he wanted to be like him. I just wondered and thought about myself, "What a stupid I was in that age! I don't know the name of any scientists at 4th standard".
Secondly, technology has created a new era for children for their educational and entertainment purposes. By using technology, a child can mitigate his boringness, passing leisure time, think smartly, able to know the world easily. For instance, my cousin is very smart and good at technical knowledge although he is only 10 years old. He loves to watch science fiction movies and try to get a lucid explanation from me. He tries to do copy some of YouTube's channel's approaches and experiment it with some elementary science activities.
Taking everything mentioned above into account, I firmly conclude that using technology is more favorable for children and it increases creativity. This is because children feel more comfortable to use it and it gives them a wide variety of benefits to accelerate their creativity
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Isioma Nwayor | 70 | view |
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to those of their parents, instead of choosing jobs that are completely different from their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Do you agree or disagree? 60
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT FIRST-YEAR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS HAVE POOR STUDY SKILL, SHOULD WE GIVE THEM A COURSE TO DEVELOP THEIR STUDY SKILL OR NOT. WHAT DO YOU THINK? EXPLAIN IT WITH SPECIFIC EXAMPLES. 73
- ome parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 834, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...apos;What a stupid I was in that age! I dont know the name of any scientists at 4th ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80371352785 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92775480541 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554376657825 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4811253537 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.55 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158389750001 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518121702878 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652836820885 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11009523362 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837436268698 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.