Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, many people focus on creating a wide social network by making as many friends as possible. The larger the number of people they acquaint, the stronger the sense of being popular they can feel. However, my view is that the ability to maintain sound friendship with a few intimate friends is of more significant for one's happiness.
To begin with, having long lasting friends gives people a sense of belonging. Although it is not a simple work to build a sincere friendship and it can take a lot of time and efforts to turn an acquaintance into a close friend, those old friends are more reliable than the new ones. It is widely acknowledged that life is repleted with ups and downs, which in both conditions intimate friends play an irreplaceable role in our life. Not only do they offer us companion by sharing joyful and bitter moment, but also genuinely support us by encourage us to face difficulties. In contrast, making new friends render us to be surrounded by more people, but we cannot rely on them all because we do not understand them as well as we know about our best friends.
Another reason why managing friendship is more desirable is that people have more in common with old friends rather than new ones. They have many precious memories of doing a lot of things together, such as participating activities, traveling and working. In addition, most of the long lasting friendships are initiated since school, thus lead people to make friends with the same insight, goal and motivation. For example, I have a friend since I was in elementary school, and the most amazing thing is that even after all this time, we still have similar interests towards a myriad of things, such as music, movies and TV programs.
In conclusion, though sustaining long-term connection is never an easy task, we are likely to be more delightful by keeping old friends since they are reliable and share worthy memories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO40 integrated 80
- TPO41 integrated 86
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather thanthe courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 70
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Us 90
- TPO44 independentSome people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together tha 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...mate friends is of more significant for ones happiness. To begin with, having lon...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, after all, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81325301205 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66475547834 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575301204819 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.0283492696 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.923076923 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 5.45110844103 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313074537402 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112724974048 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651713436066 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18017121275 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743589400988 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.