Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my perspective, real friends are the magnificent treasures in humans’ lives, and they can be very influential in their lifestyles and their way of thinking about life. Indeed, it is indisputable that friends play a pivotal role in our lives. They can make our lives more beautiful and happier than it could exist in the past. So, for making real friends and having more happiness, we should have the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time rather than the ability to make many new friends easily. I would like to put forward some of the most significant reasons to illustrate my standpoint.
First and foremost, having a small number of people over a long period of time is much better since you rely on them much better than those friends who are new persons in your life. In other words, you can trust them easily since you have a broad recognition of them. For instance, you are familiar with your old friends` perspectives, interests, and activities. With having utter recognition, you can trust them in your special circumstances which are very helpful for your happiness. Because you know that you have real friends who can help you in your difficulties and understand you as well.
Moreover, having a small group of friends over a long time can be funnier than make many friends in a short time. Because you and your old friends have a lot of things in common. You can gather with each other and tell some funny memories which makes you happy. As an example, my friends and I initiated our friendship since childhood. We have a lot of funny moments with each other during these years. When we gather in a cafe or some other places, we always remind our beautiful memories and feel happiness from deep of our hearts.
Last but not least, having a long-lasting friendship makes you feel that you recognize your friends as a family member and progress with together. Indeed, you can extend your family by making new friends and you would not feel lonely in the future. Since you are in the same ages, you can be with each other even one of you do not want to marry in the future. You can make a family with each other in your rainy days and this leads you to be happy.
Having considered all the discussion above, I tend to claim that the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time rathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time rather than the ability to make many ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...tandpoint. First and foremost, having a small number of people over a long period of time is mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng a small number of people over a long period of time is much better since you rely on them m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...e ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, you know, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59684684685 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4954172346 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421171171171 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2255659938 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1904761905 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399324474459 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138072954389 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14776517934 0.0737576698707 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29808736498 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157162508191 0.0645574589148 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.