Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Travel is most common nowadays with people because it helps to explore new places and spend valuable time with our loved ones. In my view, I think traveling without a tour guide is the best decision, I have ever made. I feel this way for two main reasons because it helps me to learn more and make use of my valuable time.
To begin with, when traveling in a group, it is good to experiment without a guide because this will help us to know more about the site and increase knowledge. Gaining more details by this way helps to retain the information for a long period rather than the just to listen to guide whatever the guide says. For example, Two years back me and my joint family in a group visited India during spring break. It was well spent one week vacation. Due to time constraint, we decided to travel without a guide and divided ourselves into a small nuclear family. Consequently, we could cover many places in India. During our dinner time at the hotel, we discussed the about the places we visited and exchanged our information, that tremendously increased out data about some parts of India though we couldn't cover all the parts of India in one week.
Next, when there are more people in a group, the guide may not explain in detail some of the areas. This is because it consumes greater time for members to assemble. For instance, Last week, I had been to Texas State Park with my local community, which consist of Ten members in one group. Everyone was supposed to assemble in front of State Park which is a common point to start our tour. Unfortunately, only four people gathered at the place on time. As we didn't have the majority of members in our group, our guide decided to wait for a while and start our tour a little bit later. As a result, due to the time limit, he explained about the State Park was superficial and he missed out some of the major details about the park, which I read it later in the news article. Hence, it is good to travel without a guide and spent good time to know more details about the site.
To recapitulate for the aforementioned reasons, I strongly believe that the good way to travel in a group without a guide because it will help to increase knowledge by experimenting self. Also because the group always consumes a lot of time which leads to gain less information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | naziii | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Christine hanna | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mobinzaarreh | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | arizaturan | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Soheyl | 76 | view |
- Firstly, genetically modified trees are designed to be hardier than nature trees; that is, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. In Hawaii, for example, a new pest-resistant species of papaya trees has been developed in respo 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Social media, such as facebook, influences children in a positive way. What isyour position? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 70
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ata about some parts of India though we couldnt cover all the parts of India in one wee...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...up, the guide may not explain in detail some of the areas. This is because it consumes grea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...le gathered at the place on time. As we didnt have the majority of members in our gro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...o wait for a while and start our tour a little bit later. As a result, due to the time lim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... Park was superficial and he missed out some of the major details about the park, which I r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 876, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me to know more details about the site. To recapitulate for the aforementioned r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...crease knowledge by experimenting self. Also because the group always consumes a lot...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47183098592 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40458672004 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476525821596 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3026655579 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105222024598 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373749954026 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341195075064 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811347985695 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290024976417 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.