Top
The author of the reading passage proposes several measures to prevent the spread of cane toad species in central Australia. However, the measures proposed by the author are contradicted by the lecturer. There are three main reasons for this contradiction which are listed below.
The first method proposed by the author involves the construction of national fence. The author claims that fencing will act as a barrier in preventing the spread of toad species and thereby contain their population in a particular area to prevent the spread of colonies. The lecturer opposes the authors claim. The lecturer says that fencing will only prevent the spread of toads on the land whereas it cannot stop the spread of young toads and toad eggs that are carried by the river streams which accounts for their spread through water.
Secondly, the author states that it is possible to capture and kill the toads and their young ones by employing volunteers. However, the lecturer discusses that by employing untrained volunteers to kill the toads, they can inadvertently kill the already endangered native frog species.
Thirdly, it is mentioned in the reading passage that use of specifically designed disease causing virus to attack and kill the cane toad species when they are infected without harming the infected reptiles and amphibians. The lecturer strongly objects the use of modified viruses to infect and kill the toad species. This is because, the lecturer feels that several pet collectors around the world unknowingly take pets from Australia that are infected with the virus designed to attack the toads. Thus, for instance when they take such infected pets to America where cane toads are a vital part of their ecosystem, infected virus can wipe out their native toad population leading to an ecological disaster.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 93 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Apolytos | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | MA KUNG TING | 80 | view |
- Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better? 70
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 85
- Social media, such as facebook, influences children in a positive way. What isyour position? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 78
- Otter 85
- Top 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...area to prevent the spread of colonies. The lecturer opposes the authors claim. The...
^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The lecturer opposes the authors claim. The lecturer says that fencing will only pr...
^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it cannot stop the spread of young toads and toad eggs that are carried by the ri...
^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... several pet collectors around the world unknowingly take pets from Australia tha...
^^
Line 4, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their native toad population leading to an ecological disaster.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17288135593 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54060955799 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5549288521 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.